Infant Formula Litigation Update

September 10, 2024

Rusty Webb continues to investigate cases where cow’s milk-based formulas and milk fortifiers have caused Necrotizing Enterocolitis in premature infants. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a serious and often fatal condition that results in the degradation and subsequent perforation of the bowels. 

 

Studies clearly show that premature, underweight infants are at a much higher risk of this often-fatal condition when given cow’s milk-based formulas like Enfamil and Similac. 


Despite the overwhelming science, and the fact that virtually every pediatric medical organization worldwide recognizes the heightened risk of NEC from these formulas, these manufacturers offer no warning whatsoever on their products about the risk. 


In a recent trial in Missouri, a jury held formula manufacturer Abbott Laboratories liable for a plaintiff’s development of NEC and subsequent injuries. In that case, the premature infant developed NEC after being fed Similac Special Care formula. Following her NEC diagnosis, the infant had 75% of her intestines removed and suffered significant permanent injuries, including brain damage. 


The jury in that case found that the Similac formula was the cause of the plaintiff’s NEC and awarded $495 million. Although this case will be subject to appeals before any money is paid, I find these results to be very promising for the litigation. ï»¿

Looking up at the roof of a building with columns and a blue sky in the background.
April 3, 2025
If you've suffered injuries in a slip and fall accident, you may be wondering whether your case will settle or go to trial. Each case is different, and several factors influence the outcome. This post explores what determines the direction of a slip and fall claim, the benefits of settling, the risks of going to trial, and how legal representation can impact your case.
The statue of Lady Justice on top of a table on the left-hand side with a gavel in the background.
March 6, 2025
Nursing home neglect is a serious issue that can put the health and safety of loved ones at risk. Families should be aware of the warning signs to ensure their relatives receive the care they deserve. Webb Law Centre PLLC in Charleston, WV, is committed to helping those affected by neglect in long-term care facilities.
February 10, 2025
Understanding Compensation in a West Virginia Wrongful Death Lawsuit
January 13, 2025
How an Attorney Determines Liability in an Auto Accident in West Virginia
January 10, 2025
Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Bicycle Accidents in West Virginia
December 16, 2024
Understanding Premise Liability in West Virginia
November 10, 2024
Understanding Your Options After a Trucking Accident in West Virginia
October 10, 2024
Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Motorcycle Accidents in West Virginia
September 17, 2024
I was asked a question recently by a non-lawyer friend that needs an answer. He asked: “What exactly is a mass tort?” I realized that a definition was in order for non-lawyers. But it could also benefit lawyers who don’t handle mass torts litigation. So here it goes. A mass tort occurs when many individuals are harmed by the same act or omission, leading to claims against the same defendant or defendants. These cases will also involve multiple plaintiffs. The cases can be combined into a class action or can be in multidistrict litigation (MDL). Mass torts refer to the law governing large groups of claimants, while class actions are a process for handling these claims. Class members have little involvement and no decision-making power once they join the class. Lawyers are selected by trial judges to lead this type of litigation. Obviously, there is much more to it. We will explain in a little more detail. At the outset, there must have been some sort of wrongdoing by the defendant or defendants. Tort law allows victims to seek compensation for harm caused by negligence or wrongful acts. While some torts affect only a few people, mass torts impact many individuals. Sometimes there will be thousands affected by the same wrongful act or omission. So, let’s take a look at class actions and MDL cases. The following will give you a general understanding of the basic difference between a class action and an MDL. Class Actions: Plaintiffs are grouped into a single lawsuit with class representatives. There will be multiple class members. MDL: Similar cases are grouped together in one court, but they remain separate lawsuits. Each plaintiff must prove their individual case. However, many MDL cases are resolved as class actions. Mass Torts include single-site, single-events, and what is labeled a dispersed mass tort. Product defects can involve various types of pharmaceuticals, including drugs and medical devices. As stated above, mass tort cases are often resolved through an MDL, where cases are heard by one judge to streamline the process and avoid inconsistent verdicts. Committees of lawyers facilitate various processes for all cases in the MDL. Source: Forbes
September 17, 2024
Since the Paraquat lawsuits began in 2021, the amount of research and data demonstrating the link between Paraquat use and the number of Parkinson’s disease diagnoses is undeniable. Recently, a man in Washington filed a paraquat lawsuit for his toxic exposure to the herbicide. The plaintiff’s assertion focused on the effects of prolonged exposure by releasing toxins known as oxidative stress. Oxidative stress occurs when there is an increased level of “free radicals” in the body. This is concerning because the brain is especially susceptible to free radical damage since it does not rely on many antioxidant defenses but is dependent on oxygen consumption for proper function. Free radicals can be neutralized by antioxidants, but if left uncontrolled, this oxidative stress can lead to severe health problems. As a result, such brain damage leads to neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. Based on the continuing research and studies, experts are uncovering the impact of Paraquat-induced oxidative stress over extended periods of time. This is especially dangerous for exposed individuals because the toxic herbicide further inhibits the flow of antioxidants and speeds up DNA cell damage. Even with the overwhelming amount of data that highlights the seemingly obvious link between Paraquat and its ban in over 60 countries, the sale of Paraquat still remains readily available in the state of California. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to evaluate and reassess both the risks and benefits of Paraquat as its preliminary analysis grossly understands the harms caused by the herbicide. The public, farmworkers, and agricultural communities deserve the long-overdue protections, and they hope that the January 2025 EPA decision will completely ban Paraquat. Source: Earth Justice
More Posts